|
Kung Fu Lineage as appeared in Kung
Fu Secrets No.1 - Yap Leong
Kung Fu practitioners like to belong to an earlier generation
or lineage. This makes them feel important with regards to seniority
as well as respect. The moment they 'enter the door' or 'yup moon',
they can claim seniority from those who come later.
When does one consider being 'yup moon'? Does it happen
when the student starts paying his or her training fees, or when he
or she is formally accepted as a disciple via a ceremony? Imagine a
situation when a student just wants to train and does not even consider
the formality of being a disciple. He/she could be training for ten
years, but a newcomer could, through good connections, wealth or influence
within a year, become a disciple. Who then is more senior? The student
who is not a disciple or the one who is?
How about the new student, who is much older than an
existing student, but joins a day later? Who then should call who 'Si-Hing'?
Why the confusion? In a Western style education, we
know where we stand -whether qualified or not. We cannot escape the
certificate system! In Oriental martial arts it is based on a mixture
of patronage, wealth, influence, dedication, and being there at the
right time. It also depends on the mood, integrity, greed and attitude
of the Master.
For instance, a student may be training with a Master
for 20 years. Suddenly they fall out, and the student goes his own way.
The Master then accuses his student of being a 'farn kuat chai' literary
meaning 'a guy who turns the bone' or 'one who betrays'. Out of spite,
jealousy, anger or whatever, he disowns his student and appoints his
next student, who may not have done as many years or even be as skilful
as 'his future heir'. Never mind. The Master will then say that he never
taught his departed student anything, and that the secrets are still
with him. He will of course offer his so-called secrets to his future
choice. What does the departed student do? To justify his departure,
he will say that his (former) Master was greedy, and that he never taught
him anything at all, and always indulged in martial arts politics.
With modern communications, it is not difficult to find
out information or identities of Masters or seniors of those publicly
teaching, provided they are still alive. Hence all these travels to
far flung corners in China to 'bye si' (to be accepted) and 'yup moon'
with a handy red packet. These red packets may not mean of lot in financial
terms to a Westerner or Overseas Chinese, but to a poor Chinese Master
it is 'hell of a lot'. They usually pay a visit each year, and after
a few years, come back with a scroll, letter, certificate, plenty of
photos with their Masters or whatever to say that they have mustered
a complete kung fu system. They then became the appointed custodians
of their system on the death of their Masters.
What about the poor blokes in China, who toiled day
in, day out and made tea, even for the foreign students? They could
be training from the age of six for twenty years upwards, but never
mind, they were not good enough to earn the attention of their Masters
or become the next 'Jeon Moon Yern' (appointed guardian of the system)
The well-tanned Westerners or Overseas Chinese then
return to their countries and tell the world, especially through the
popular Martial Arts Magazines, that they would become the next 'Jeon
Moon Yern' after the death of their Masters. They display their certificates
and pelt out Chinese terms like 'Lau Soo or Sifu (teacher), Dor Jia
or Xia Xia' (thanks) etc. to convince us skeptics that they had in fact
deserved to inherit their systems.
What about their Ex-Masters who taught them the same
systems? Bad luck to them. They would have become 'juniors' if their
Masters in China were their Grandmasters. By this process, the foreign
Westerners or Chinese have moved one generation up and pushed their
Ex-Masters one generation down. Their Sifus have become their Si-Jut
through a simple process of going to the source.
At worst they can then addressed their Ex-Masters as
'Si-hing' if both shared the same Masters in China.
The moving up the ladder of seniority does not have
to be within the same Master lineage. It could be through an indirect
lineage, through another Master, but within the same system.
It is very common to see a 'family tree' showing who
is who. This is a sneaky way to show one's seniority over another through
an indirect link back to as far back as possible to a famous Master
a few generations back.
The first thing for a student or potential student would
be to pick out a famous Master in the family tree - one who is currently
teaching. He then look for names listed 2 generations above that Master.
Those listed do not need to be any good or capable. They could very
well be geriatric or incapacitated. The only criteria is seniority.
They would then pay a visit to that person and 'bye see' and 'yup moon'.
After that, they proudly announce to the world, by updating the family
tree with your names added, and publishing the facts in a popular magazine.
They then keep on repeating the Mantra that that so and so famous Master
is in fact their Si-jut (nephew), if not in front, then, behind his
back.
Kung Fu Lineage II (short extract) - will be appearing
in future edition of Kung Fu Secrets - Yap Leong
Once upon a time there was a guy who fell out with his
Taekwondo master, left and started his own dojo. He neither had permission
from his ex-teacher to teach nor a certificate to prove his lineage.
Subsequently, through his contacts he joined a famous master of a different
system.. He then claimed lineage by having a signed and dated certificate
and proudly bragged of his 'status'. What he had forgotten was his own
past and also the fact that none of the masters or grandmasters in the
past had certificates. Their only certificate was the size of their
fists. In those days, in China, all these masters needed to prove was
to prevent their sign-boards from being smashed by outsiders. It was
known as 'Charc Jiu Pai' in Cantonese. If they still remained intact,
they would be their certificates. The advice to these so-called diploma
holders is to quietly teach their own students, make a small living
and refrain from bragging, because by doing so, they are insulting their
masters or grandmasters who never held 'diplomas'.
The Ancient
Sage he says: 'show me your certificate to prove your lineage'
The Modern Sage he says: 'show me
yours first'
|